Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2008 Mini Hardtop Mini Hardtop 2016

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Ford Ranger (2008) vs. Mini Hardtop (2016) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2008 Ford Ranger and 2016 Mini Hardtop specs.

2008 Ford Ranger and 2016 Mini Hardtop Specifications

Model Year 2008 2016  
Model Ford Ranger Mini Hardtop  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body  
      Difference
Total Legroom 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2008 Ford Ranger

2008 Ford Ranger Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2007 2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 148-horsepower 3.0L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
The rear jump seats are suitable only for children. see full Ford Ranger review
 

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Mini Hardtop

2016 Mini Hardtop Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearComment
The 4 Door has 1.5 inches more rear legroom than the regular Hardtop, but 32.3 inches still isn't much. At 5-9, I can squeeze behind myself with perhaps an inch between my knees and the carved-out front seatbacks. Rear headroom is relatively abundant even though the seat cushion is mounted a comfortable height off the floor. The rear doors, though an improvement over the Clubman's single rear-hinged half-door, are still small and don't open wide. A Ford Fiesta ST might be at least as tight in the back seat, but the GTI, with 35.6 inches of rear legroom, is far roomier and easier to get into and out of. see full Mini Hardtop review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Mini Hardtop

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Mini Hardtop.

Be the first!

See TrueDelta's information for all Pickups
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.