Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2006 Nissan cube Nissan cube 2010

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Ford Ranger (2006) vs. Nissan cube (2010) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2006 Ford Ranger and 2010 Nissan cube specs.

2006 Ford Ranger and 2010 Nissan cube Specifications

Model Year 2006 2010  
Model Ford Ranger Nissan cube  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body  
      Difference
Total Legroom 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Ford Ranger

2006 Ford Ranger Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2007 2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 148-horsepower 3.0L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
The rear jump seats are suitable only for children. see full Ford Ranger review
2005 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
Rear compartment of Ranger extended cab is smaller and has side-facing jumpseats. see full Ford Ranger review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Nissan cube

2010 Nissan cube Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2010 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
CVT FWD
Unparalleled rear seat room and comfort in this car for passengers. Should be among the easier cars of this size to put a baby seat into the back, if we have children. Our (longer and lower) 2004 Sentra paled in comparison of back seat usability. see full Nissan cube review
2010 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
CVT FWD
Adults can sit there in comfort. see full Nissan cube review
2009 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
CVT FWD
SEATS ARE COMFY FOR LONG TRIPS. DO NOT BEAT THE HELL OUT OF YOU. see full Nissan cube review
 
See TrueDelta's information for all Pickups
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.