Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2003 Toyota 4Runner Toyota 4Runner 2012

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Ford Ranger (2003) vs. Toyota 4Runner (2012) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2003 Ford Ranger and 2012 Toyota 4Runner specs.

2003 Ford Ranger and 2012 Toyota 4Runner Specifications

Model Year 2003 2012  
Model Ford Ranger Toyota 4Runner  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body  
      Difference
Total Legroom 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2003 Ford Ranger

2003 Ford Ranger Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2004 2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
The jump seats in a Ranger are not very practical for long trips what so ever, not much room other than for storage, and they are not comfortable. I think that a Full 4 door model of the Ranger would be great, maybe a redesign will incorporate a backseat see full Ford Ranger review
2002 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range
The rear seats are very small but I did not buy it for rear seat comfort. I actually removed the seats to get more storage space behind the front seats. see full Ford Ranger review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Toyota 4Runner

2012 Toyota 4Runner Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2011 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
Not wide enough for circumferentially challenged bodies. Bottom cushion too narrow, confined bolsters, not long enough under thighs. see full Toyota 4Runner review
 
See TrueDelta's information for all Pickups
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.