Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2006 Volkswagen Passat Volkswagen Passat 2015

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Ford Ranger (2006) vs. Volkswagen Passat (2015) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2006 Ford Ranger and 2015 Volkswagen Passat specs.

2006 Ford Ranger and 2015 Volkswagen Passat Specifications

Model Year 2006 2015  
Model Ford Ranger Volkswagen Passat  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body  
      Difference
Total Legroom 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Ford Ranger

2006 Ford Ranger Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2007 2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 148-horsepower 3.0L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
The rear jump seats are suitable only for children. see full Ford Ranger review
2005 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
Rear compartment of Ranger extended cab is smaller and has side-facing jumpseats. see full Ford Ranger review
 

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Volkswagen Passat

2015 Volkswagen Passat Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearComment
2015 The Passat's top strength remains a non-sporting attribute: never mind how the specs compare, the midsize Volkswagen has the roomiest interior in its class. Rear seat legroom seems limo-like compared to the merely adequate space inside the Mazda. Up front, there's also plenty of stretch-out space for heads, shoulders, and knees. The Passat's trunk is also among the largest, though in this area the Mazda comes up only a cubic foot short. see full Volkswagen Passat review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Volkswagen Passat

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Volkswagen Passat.

Be the first!

See TrueDelta's information for all Pickups
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.