Ford Taurus X (2009) vs. Dodge Charger (2016) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2009 Ford Taurus X and 2016 Dodge Charger specs.
2009 Ford Taurus X and 2016 Dodge Charger Specifications
| Model Year |
2009 |
2016 |
|
| Model |
Ford Taurus X |
Dodge Charger |
|
| Engine |
|
|
|
| Transmission |
|
|
|
| Drivetrain |
|
|
|
| Body |
4dr Wagon |
4dr Sedan |
|
| |
|
|
Difference |
| Wheelbase |
2,868 mm |
3,053 mm |
-1 mm |
| Length |
5,088 mm |
5,039 mm |
0 mm |
| Width |
1,902 mm |
1,905 mm |
0 mm |
| Height |
1,712 mm |
1,478 mm |
0 mm |
| Curb Weight |
1,829 kg |
1,784 kg |
0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity |
72 L |
70 L |
2 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 |
1,001 mm |
980 mm |
-979 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
1,486 mm |
1,511 mm |
0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 |
1,402 mm |
1,427 mm |
0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 |
1,036 mm |
1,062 mm |
0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 |
1,001 mm |
930 mm |
-929 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
1,471 mm |
1,471 mm |
0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 |
1,433 mm |
1,425 mm |
0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 |
1,011 mm |
1,019 mm |
0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 |
978 mm |
0 mm |
978 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 |
1,285 mm |
0 mm |
1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 |
1,168 mm |
0 mm |
1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 |
853 mm |
0 mm |
853 mm |
| Total Legroom |
2,901 mm (over 3 rows) |
2,080 mm (over 2 rows) |
0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum |
493 L |
456 L |
37 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 |
1,342 L |
16.1 |
-15.1 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum |
2,413 L |
16.1 |
-14.1 L |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Ford Taurus X
| 2008 |
4dr Wagon 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed automatic AWD |
The second row seat was mounted comfortably high off the floor.
see full Ford Taurus X review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Dodge Charger
| 2015 |
The Road & Track package includes some of the best front seats I've experienced. The side bolsters, though not adjustable, manage to effectively hold slender drivers in place without uncomfortably constraining far-from-slender ones. Synthetic suede center panels assist in this task. Yet as performance-oriented as these seats are, they aren't overly firm, and should prove comfortable even on day-long drives.
Despite the more hardcore nature of the Chevrolet SS, its front seats have much smaller, far less effective bolsters. Some synthetic suede helps to mitigate this shortcoming, but the Dodge's buckets are much better for both comfort and support.
see full Dodge Charger review |
| 2016 Dodge Charger Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Comment |
|
The Dodge Charger's rear seat cushion is comfortably shaped and positioned. Rear knee room, though less abundant than the sedan's exterior dimensions might suggest, is neverless generous. So what is rear seat room doing among the reasons not to buy a Charger?
Well, headroom is in short supply. People 5-11 and up could become painfully familiar with the backlight. Shorter passengers won't experience this issue, but could find the back seat uncomfortably confining because the smallish rear side windows descend only to neck level. For more rear headroom and larger rear side windows, check out the related Chrysler 300. Or the Chevrolet SS, which has 1.4 inches more rear headroom than the Charger.
see full Dodge Charger review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Dodge Charger
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Dodge Charger.
Be the first!
See TrueDelta's information for all
WagonsSee TrueDelta's information for all
Ford models.
