| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2009 Ford Taurus X and 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee Specifications
| Model Year | 2009 | 2006 | |
| Model | Ford Taurus X | Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Wagon | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,868 mm | 2,781 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 5,088 mm | 4,740 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 1,902 mm | 1,862 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,712 mm | 1,720 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,829 kg | 1,930 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 72 L | 79 L | -7 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,001 mm | 1,008 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,486 mm | 1,501 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,402 mm | 1,463 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,036 mm | 1,059 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,001 mm | 998 mm | -997 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,471 mm | 1,486 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,433 mm | 1,539 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,011 mm | 902 mm | -901 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 978 mm | 0 mm | 978 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,285 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,168 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 853 mm | 0 mm | 853 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,901 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,961 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 493 L | 977 L | -484 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,342 L | 34.5 | -33.5 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,413 L | 1,909 L | 1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Ford Taurus X
| 2009 Ford Taurus X Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr Wagon 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed automatic AWD |
The second row seat was mounted comfortably high off the floor. see full Ford Taurus X review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee
| 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2005 | 4dr SUV 210-horsepower 3.7L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Very comfortable driving. see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
| 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 235-horsepower 4.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
That and MPG are the only real faults so far after 15000 miles and 15 mons. I think our 2001 GC has more seat comfort although the 07s seats do fold over easier than the 01s. see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
| 2005 | 4dr SUV 210-horsepower 3.7L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Very little leg room for an adult. see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Wagons
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
