| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2008 Ford Taurus X and 2016 Nissan Murano Specifications
| Model Year | 2008 | 2016 | |
| Model | Ford Taurus X | Nissan Murano | |
| Engine | 3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 263 hp@6250 249 lb-ft@4500 |
3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 260 hp@6000 240 lb-ft@4400 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed automatic | 7-speed shiftable CVT | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr Wagon | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,868 mm | 2,824 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 5,088 mm | 4,897 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 1,902 mm | 1,915 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,712 mm | 1,692 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,907 kg | 1,778 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 72 L | 72 L | 0 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,001 mm | 1,013 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,486 mm | 1,514 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,402 mm | 1,392 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,036 mm | 1,107 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,001 mm | 1,011 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,471 mm | 1,494 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,433 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,011 mm | 983 mm | -982 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 978 mm | 0 mm | 978 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,285 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,168 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 853 mm | 0 mm | 853 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,901 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,090 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 493 L | 1,121 L | 492 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,342 L | 39.6 | -38.6 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,413 L | 1,979 L | 1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2008 Ford Taurus X
| 2008 Ford Taurus X Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr Wagon 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed automatic AWD |
The second row seat was mounted comfortably high off the floor. see full Ford Taurus X review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Nissan Murano
| 2016 Nissan Murano Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | I nearly ranked the new Nissan Murano's front seats ahead of its styling as reasons to buy one. With form-fitting contours and cushy-yet-supportive construction "inspired by NASA," they're that good. I wasn't able to drive the Murano all day, but felt like I easily could have. The 2015 Ford Edge's driver seat didn't initially strike me as especially comfortable. It felt flatter and less luxurious than that in the Nissan. But over the course of my test drive it seemed to fit and support me better and better. By the end it seemed very comfortable, yet still not quite as good as the Nissan's. The Edge Titanium's seats have a sportier appearance and shape than the SEL's, and might provide more lateral support. see full Nissan Murano review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Nissan Murano
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Nissan Murano.
See TrueDelta's information for all Wagons
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
