| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 Ford Taurus and 2004 Chrysler Crossfire Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2004 | |
| Model | Ford Taurus | Chrysler Crossfire | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford Taurus
| 2013 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The front seats are horrible- similar to airline seats, and no amount of adjusting or adding cushions helped. I'm 6'2 and my wife is 5'3.and neither of us could get comfortable. After 2 weeks, it was actually painful to drive this car. see full Ford Taurus review |
| 2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Not enough headroom for adults in the rear seat. Seat comfort is as poor as the front seats. see full Ford Taurus review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2004 Chrysler Crossfire
| 2004 Chrysler Crossfire Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2005 | 2dr Hatch 215-horsepower 3.2L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
There is none see full Chrysler Crossfire review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
