Ford Taurus (2012) vs. (2009) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2012 Ford Taurus and 2009 specs.
2012 Ford Taurus and 2009 Specifications
Model Year |
2012 |
2009 |
|
Model |
Ford Taurus |
|
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Total Legroom |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Ford Taurus
2011 |
4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Three adult room in the back seat - comfortably!
see full Ford Taurus review |
2012 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 |
0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The front seats are horrible- similar to airline seats, and no amount of adjusting or adding cushions helped. I'm 6'2 and my wife is 5'3.and neither of us could get comfortable. After 2 weeks, it was actually painful to drive this car.
see full Ford Taurus review |
2012 |
0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Not enough headroom for adults in the rear seat. Seat comfort is as poor as the front seats.
see full Ford Taurus review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009
2009 |
0 |
I'm tall (6'1" or 183cm) - and I have an abnormally long back. The Honda Jazz (or Honda Fit) (2002-2014) is one of the few cars I can comfortably sit in the back seat. In most small cars - and some large cars - I touch the roof. Plus, the origamiversatility of the seating, conversion into storage is brilliant - and better than many far larger cars.
see full review |
2009 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2009 |
0 |
Only 'just' adequate for me at 6'1"/183cm. Taller or longer-limbed drivers would have problems, probably. Headroom is excellent.
see full review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all
Ford models.