Model Year | 2013 | 2006 | |
Model | Ford Taurus | Mitsubishi Montero | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 112.9 in | 109.7 in | 3.2 in |
Length | 202.9 in | 190.2 in | 12.7 in |
Width | 76.2 in | 74.8 in | 1.4 in |
Height | 60.7 in | 74.2 in | -13.5 in |
Curb Weight | 3969 lb. | 4787 lb. | -818 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 20.0 gal. | 23.8 gal. | -3.8 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 39.0 in | 41.5 in | -2.5 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 57.9 in | 58.5 in | -0.6 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 56.3 in | 57.7 in | -1.4 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 41.9 in | 42.3 in | -0.4 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 37.8 in | 40.6 in | -2.8 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 56.9 in | 57.5 in | -0.6 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 55.8 in | 55.5 in | 0.3 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 38.1 in | 35.2 in | 2.9 in |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 37.4 in | -37.4 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 54.7 in | -54.7 in |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 45.3 in | -45.3 in |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 25.2 in | -25.2 in |
Total Legroom | 80 in (over 2 rows) | 102.7 in (over 3 rows) | -22.7 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 20.1 ft3 | 0.0 | 20.1 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 20.1 | 39.8 | -19.7 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 20.1 ft3 | 91.7 | -71.6 ft3 |
2013 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The front seats are horrible- similar to airline seats, and no amount of adjusting or adding cushions helped. I'm 6'2 and my wife is 5'3.and neither of us could get comfortable. After 2 weeks, it was actually painful to drive this car. see full Ford Taurus review |
2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Not enough headroom for adults in the rear seat. Seat comfort is as poor as the front seats. see full Ford Taurus review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2006 Mitsubishi Montero.