Model Year | 2013 | 2016 | |
Model | Ford Taurus | Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 112.9 in | 105.1 in | 7.8 in |
Length | 202.9 in | 184.8 in | 18.1 in |
Width | 76.2 in | 71.3 in | 4.9 in |
Height | 60.7 in | 66.1 in | -5.4 in |
Curb Weight | 3969 lb. | 3318 lb. | 651 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 20.0 gal. | 16.6 gal. | 3.4 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 39.0 in | 40.6 in | -1.6 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 57.9 in | 56.6 in | 1.3 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 56.3 in | 52.6 in | 3.7 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 41.9 in | 40.9 in | 1 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 37.8 in | 38.4 in | -0.6 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 56.9 in | 56.1 in | 0.8 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 55.8 in | 51.7 in | 4.1 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 38.1 in | 37.3 in | 0.8 in |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 35.7 in | -35.7 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 51.4 in | -51.4 in |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 39.4 in | -39.4 in |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 28.2 in | -28.2 in |
Total Legroom | 80 in (over 2 rows) | 106.4 in (over 3 rows) | -26.4 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 20.1 ft3 | 10.3 ft3 | 9.8 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 20.1 | 34.2 ft3 | -14.1 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 20.1 ft3 | 63.3 ft3 | -43.2 ft3 |
2013 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The front seats are horrible- similar to airline seats, and no amount of adjusting or adding cushions helped. I'm 6'2 and my wife is 5'3.and neither of us could get comfortable. After 2 weeks, it was actually painful to drive this car. see full Ford Taurus review |
2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Not enough headroom for adults in the rear seat. Seat comfort is as poor as the front seats. see full Ford Taurus review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Mitsubishi Outlander.