Model Year | 2013 | 2009 | |
Model | Ford Taurus | Volvo C70 | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Sedan | 2dr Hardtop conv. | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,868 mm | 2,639 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 5,154 mm | 4,582 mm | 1 mm |
Width | 1,935 mm | 1,836 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,542 mm | 1,400 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,800 kg | 1,720 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 76 L | 62 L | 14 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 991 mm | 970 mm | 21 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,471 mm | 1,361 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,430 mm | 1,349 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,064 mm | 1,074 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 960 mm | 925 mm | 35 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,445 mm | 1,194 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,417 mm | 1,054 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 968 mm | 861 mm | 107 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,032 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,935 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
Cargo Volume | 569 L | 362 L | 207 L |
2013 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The front seats are horrible- similar to airline seats, and no amount of adjusting or adding cushions helped. I'm 6'2 and my wife is 5'3.and neither of us could get comfortable. After 2 weeks, it was actually painful to drive this car. see full Ford Taurus review |
2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Not enough headroom for adults in the rear seat. Seat comfort is as poor as the front seats. see full Ford Taurus review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2009 Volvo C70.