Model Year | 2013 | 2010 | |
Model | Ford Taurus | Volvo XC60 | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 112.9 in | 109.2 in | 3.7 in |
Length | 202.9 in | 182.2 in | 20.7 in |
Width | 76.2 in | 74.4 in | 1.8 in |
Height | 60.7 in | 67.4 in | -6.7 in |
Curb Weight | 3969 lb. | 4012 lb. | -43 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 20.0 gal. | 18.5 gal. | 1.5 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 39.0 in | 38.0 in | 1 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 57.9 in | 56.7 in | 1.2 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 56.3 in | 54.2 in | 2.1 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 41.9 in | 41.2 in | 0.7 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 37.8 in | 38.1 in | -0.3 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 56.9 in | 55.2 in | 1.7 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 55.8 in | 53.8 in | 2 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 38.1 in | 36.4 in | 1.7 in |
Total Legroom | 80 in (over 2 rows) | 77.6 in (over 2 rows) | 2.4 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 20.1 ft3 | 30.8 ft3 | -10.7 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 20.1 ft3 | 67.4 ft3 | -47.3 ft3 |
2013 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The front seats are horrible- similar to airline seats, and no amount of adjusting or adding cushions helped. I'm 6'2 and my wife is 5'3.and neither of us could get comfortable. After 2 weeks, it was actually painful to drive this car. see full Ford Taurus review |
2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Not enough headroom for adults in the rear seat. Seat comfort is as poor as the front seats. see full Ford Taurus review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2010 Volvo XC60.