| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2015 Ford Transit Connect and 2017 Chevrolet SS Specifications
| Model Year | 2015 | 2017 | |
| Model | Ford Transit Connect | Chevrolet SS | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Minivan, ext. | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 120.6 in | 114.8 in | 5.8 in |
| Length | 189.7 in | 195.5 in | -5.8 in |
| Width | 72.2 in | 74.7 in | -2.5 in |
| Height | 72.0 in | 57.9 in | 14.1 in |
| Curb Weight | 3979 lb. | 3997 lb. | -18 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 15.8 gal. | 18.8 gal. | -3 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 46.9 in | 38.7 in | 8.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 57.7 in | 59.1 in | -1.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 54.6 in | 57.2 in | -2.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 40.3 in | 42.3 in | -2 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 45.1 in | 38.0 in | 7.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 58.5 in | 59.0 in | -0.5 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 58.5 in | 58.0 in | 0.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 37.6 in | 39.7 in | -2.1 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 41.3 in | 0.0 in | 41.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 56.3 in | 0.0 in | 56.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 47.0 in | 0.0 in | 47 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 35.0 in | 0.0 in | 35 in |
| Total Legroom | 112.9 in (over 3 rows) | 82 in (over 2 rows) | 30.9 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 19.8 ft3 | 16.4 ft3 | 3.4 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 58.9 ft3 | 16.4 | 42.5 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 104.2 ft3 | 16.4 ft3 | 87.8 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Transit Connect
| 2015 Ford Transit Connect Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The Transit Connect's second-row bench is roomy and fairly comfortable for two people, but somewhat tight for three. The Sienna has another half-foot of shoulder room. Also, the seatback in the Ford's second row does not recline. If you do want captain's chairs, well, they're not an option. The situation worsens in the Ford's third row, which is less substantial and much lower to the floor than the third-row seats in the Honda or the Toyota. Unlike the Transit Connect's second row, its third-row seat does slide fore-aft (about six inches) and recline. Slide it all the way back, and legroom becomes almost generous. Still, it isn't a place many adults would want to spend much time. On top of this, it should be easier to open and close the Transit Connect's sliding doors and to get into its third row. The second row doesn't tip or slide forward like those in conventional minivans. Instead, it must be pushed to the floor in a fairly difficult two-step procedure. see full Ford Transit Connect review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Transit Connect
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Ford Transit Connect.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Chevrolet SS
| 2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is functional and roomy. I'm 6'4" and with the drivers seat in my preferred postion there is still a decent amount of legroom behind. Overall much better than the Charger/Challenger. see full Chevrolet SS review |
| 2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
The front seat is just OK. Feels like a pretty flat bottom and fairly hard. Also, for a car with sporting pretentions there is surprisingly little side bolstering. see full Chevrolet SS review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Minivans
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
