Ford Transit Connect (2019) vs. Dodge Charger (2016) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2019 Ford Transit Connect and 2016 Dodge Charger specs.
2019 Ford Transit Connect and 2016 Dodge Charger Specifications
Model Year |
2019 |
2016 |
|
Model |
Ford Transit Connect |
Dodge Charger |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
4dr Minivan, ext. |
4dr Sedan |
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Wheelbase |
3,063 mm |
3,053 mm |
0 mm |
Length |
4,826 mm |
5,039 mm |
-1 mm |
Width |
1,834 mm |
1,905 mm |
0 mm |
Height |
1,819 mm |
1,478 mm |
0 mm |
Curb Weight |
1,813 kg |
1,784 kg |
0 kg |
Fuel Capacity |
60 L |
70 L |
-10 L |
Headroom, Row 1 |
1,191 mm |
980 mm |
-979 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
1,463 mm |
1,511 mm |
0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 |
1,377 mm |
1,427 mm |
0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 |
1,024 mm |
1,062 mm |
0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 |
1,161 mm |
930 mm |
-929 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
1,486 mm |
1,471 mm |
0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 |
1,481 mm |
1,425 mm |
0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 |
955 mm |
1,019 mm |
954 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 |
1,064 mm |
0 mm |
1 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 |
1,430 mm |
0 mm |
1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 |
1,194 mm |
0 mm |
1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 |
889 mm |
0 mm |
889 mm |
Total Legroom |
2,868 mm (over 3 rows) |
2,080 mm (over 2 rows) |
0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum |
705 L |
456 L |
249 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 |
1,702 L |
16.1 |
-15.1 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum |
3,002 L |
16.1 |
-13.1 L |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2019 Ford Transit Connect
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2019 Ford Transit Connect.
Be the first!
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Dodge Charger
2015 |
The Road & Track package includes some of the best front seats I've experienced. The side bolsters, though not adjustable, manage to effectively hold slender drivers in place without uncomfortably constraining far-from-slender ones. Synthetic suede center panels assist in this task. Yet as performance-oriented as these seats are, they aren't overly firm, and should prove comfortable even on day-long drives.
Despite the more hardcore nature of the Chevrolet SS, its front seats have much smaller, far less effective bolsters. Some synthetic suede helps to mitigate this shortcoming, but the Dodge's buckets are much better for both comfort and support.
see full Dodge Charger review |
2016 Dodge Charger Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Comment |
|
The Dodge Charger's rear seat cushion is comfortably shaped and positioned. Rear knee room, though less abundant than the sedan's exterior dimensions might suggest, is neverless generous. So what is rear seat room doing among the reasons not to buy a Charger?
Well, headroom is in short supply. People 5-11 and up could become painfully familiar with the backlight. Shorter passengers won't experience this issue, but could find the back seat uncomfortably confining because the smallish rear side windows descend only to neck level. For more rear headroom and larger rear side windows, check out the related Chrysler 300. Or the Chevrolet SS, which has 1.4 inches more rear headroom than the Charger.
see full Dodge Charger review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Dodge Charger
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Dodge Charger.
Be the first!
See TrueDelta's information for all
Minivans
See TrueDelta's information for all
Ford models.