Model Year | 2010 | 2018 | |
Model | Ford Transit Connect | Mazda CX-5 | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Minivan | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,911 mm | 2,697 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,590 mm | 4,549 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,796 mm | 1,842 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 2,014 mm | 1,659 mm | 1 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,554 kg | 1,616 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 58 L | 56 L | 2 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,298 mm | 1,008 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,382 mm | 1,450 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,290 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,029 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,283 mm | 991 mm | -990 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,514 mm | 1,392 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,519 mm | 1,405 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 978 mm | 1,006 mm | 977 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,007 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,047 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 2,212 L | 875 L | -873 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 3,831 L | 1,688 L | 2 L |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2010 Ford Transit Connect.
2018 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-5.