| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 Ford Transit Connect and 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2013 | |
| Model | Ford Transit Connect | Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Minivan | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,911 mm | 2,670 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,590 mm | 4,641 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,796 mm | 1,801 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 2,014 mm | 1,679 mm | 1 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,554 kg | 1,540 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 58 L | 63 L | -5 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,298 mm | 1,024 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,382 mm | 1,433 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,290 mm | 1,326 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,029 mm | 1,057 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,283 mm | 973 mm | -972 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,514 mm | 1,425 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,519 mm | 1,318 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 978 mm | 935 mm | 43 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 899 mm | -899 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,265 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 993 mm | -993 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 704 mm | -704 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,007 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,695 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 2,212 L | 422 L | -420 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 78.1 | 1,025 L | 77.1 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 3,831 L | 2,056 L | 1 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford Transit Connect
| 2013 Ford Transit Connect Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The Transit Connect's second-row bench is roomy and fairly comfortable for two people, but somewhat tight for three. The Sienna has another half-foot of shoulder room. Also, the seatback in the Ford's second row does not recline. If you do want captain's chairs, well, they're not an option. The situation worsens in the Ford's third row, which is less substantial and much lower to the floor than the third-row seats in the Honda or the Toyota. Unlike the Transit Connect's second row, its third-row seat does slide fore-aft (about six inches) and recline. Slide it all the way back, and legroom becomes almost generous. Still, it isn't a place many adults would want to spend much time. On top of this, it should be easier to open and close the Transit Connect's sliding doors and to get into its third row. The second row doesn't tip or slide forward like those in conventional minivans. Instead, it must be pushed to the floor in a fairly difficult two-step procedure. see full Ford Transit Connect review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford Transit Connect
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Ford Transit Connect.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander
| 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| There's a reason three-row crossovers tend to be much larger than this pair. The third-row seat in the Kia Sorento doesn't provide enough headroom for the average adult male. Both comfort and knee room are also in short supply. You might think that a seat couldn't get any tighter than the Sorento's third row. But, based on the official specs, the Outlander has nearly four inches less combined legroom--a huge difference. Even children won't fit in the Mitsubishi's third row unless you slide the second row forward much of the way. The 2014's third row seat is at least a conventional seat. Last year it was little more than a sling. In either vehicle the second row split bench is roomy and comfortable, with enough height off the floor to provide adults with good thigh support. But the rear passengers in the Outlander don't get air vents. Those in the Kia do. see full Mitsubishi Outlander review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander.
See TrueDelta's information for all Minivans
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
