| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2020 Ford Transit Connect and 2016 Subaru Forester Specifications
| Model Year | 2020 | 2016 | |
| Model | Ford Transit Connect | Subaru Forester | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Minivan, ext. | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 3,063 mm | 2,639 mm | 1 mm |
| Length | 4,826 mm | 4,595 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,834 mm | 1,796 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,819 mm | 1,687 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,813 kg | 1,495 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 60 L | 60 L | 0 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,191 mm | 1,052 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,463 mm | 1,448 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,377 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,024 mm | 1,092 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,161 mm | 1,011 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,486 mm | 1,435 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,481 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 955 mm | 965 mm | -10 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 1,064 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,430 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,194 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 889 mm | 0 mm | 889 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,868 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,057 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 705 L | 974 L | -269 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,702 L | 34.4 | -33.4 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 3,002 L | 2,115 L | 1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2020 Ford Transit Connect
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2020 Ford Transit Connect.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Subaru Forester
| 2016 Subaru Forester Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2015 | 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L H4 CVT AWD |
I'm 6'3" and often don't fit comfortable in vehicles. I found this had a very nice amount of front seat room. The center console tends to stay out of the way as well, some newer designs have the center stack moving into where my right knee would be. It's a very noticeable improvement over my previous 2009 Escape. I actually found the Forester more comfortable for me than the Outback. I was expecting the opposite. see full Subaru Forester review |
| 2015 | 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L H4 CVT AWD |
After looking at Explorer's, I was surprised how much more room the Forester had in the back seat. Granted it doesn't have a third row, but if you don't need a 3rd row, the Forester is hard to beat in this segment for rear seat room. We can put a forward facing child seat in the back, move the front seat up a about 2 inches from all the way back and there's still plenty of front passenger room and my 1.5 year old son can't kick the back of the seat. see full Subaru Forester review |
| 2016 Subaru Forester Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 250hp 2.0L H4 8-speed shiftable CVT AWD |
- Terrible front seat support - The cushions are too short - It's not noticeable on a test drive right away. I would not have bought the car! Test drive extensively! - Surfaces where your elbows would lay are too hard - I purchased foam pads to make it feel better. - Tall drivers like myself will struggle with the telescoping wheel's short extension range. - It is hard to get into a fully comfortable driving position. The memory seats in the XT help somewhat by retaining your seat settings if moved. - Front seat cushions are too short - Yes I said this twice - Front seat cushions are too short - Yes I said this THREE times! Subaru are you listening? The front seat cushions are WAY TOO SHORT! see full Subaru Forester review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Minivans
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
