(2009) vs. (2010) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2009 and 2010 specs.
2009 and 2010 Specifications
Model Year |
2009 |
2010 |
|
Model |
|
|
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Total Legroom |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009
2010 |
4dr SUV 182-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
great, lots of room for a 6ft.3in teenager
see full review |
2010 |
4dr SUV 182-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Plenty of rear seat lag room with seat fully slide back.
see full review |
2010 |
4dr SUV 182-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Comfortable vehicle for driver and front seat passenger
see full review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010
2009 |
0 |
I'm tall (6'1" or 183cm) - and I have an abnormally long back. The Honda Jazz (or Honda Fit) (2002-2014) is one of the few cars I can comfortably sit in the back seat. In most small cars - and some large cars - I touch the roof. Plus, the origamiversatility of the seating, conversion into storage is brilliant - and better than many far larger cars.
see full review |
2010 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2009 |
0 |
Only 'just' adequate for me at 6'1"/183cm. Taller or longer-limbed drivers would have problems, probably. Headroom is excellent.
see full review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all
GMC models.