GMC Terrain GMC Terrain 2017 Toyota 4Runner Toyota 4Runner 2006

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

GMC Terrain (2017) vs. Toyota 4Runner (2006) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2017 GMC Terrain and 2006 Toyota 4Runner specs.

2017 GMC Terrain and 2006 Toyota 4Runner Specifications

Model Year 2017 2006  
Model GMC Terrain Toyota 4Runner  
Engine 3.6L V6
DOHC-4v
301 hp@6500
272 lb-ft@4800
4.7L V8
DOHC-4v
260 hp@5400
306 lb-ft@3400
 
Transmission 6-speed shiftable automatic 5-speed automatic  
Drivetrain FWD RWD  
Body 4dr SUV 4dr SUV  
      Difference
Wheelbase 2,858 mm 2,789 mm 0 mm
Length 4,712 mm 4,806 mm 0 mm
Width 1,849 mm 1,910 mm 0 mm
Height 1,684 mm 1,760 mm 0 mm
Curb Weight 1,809 kg 1,930 kg 0 kg
Fuel Capacity 71 L 87 L -16 L
Headroom, Row 1 1,011 mm 1,008 mm 0 mm
Shoulder Room, Row 1 1,415 mm 1,473 mm 0 mm
Hip Room, Row 1 1,400 mm 1,405 mm 0 mm
Legroom, Row 1 1,046 mm 1,062 mm 0 mm
Headroom, Row 2 996 mm 993 mm 3 mm
Shoulder Room, Row 2 1,405 mm 1,453 mm 0 mm
Hip Room, Row 2 1,303 mm 1,407 mm 0 mm
Legroom, Row 2 1,013 mm 879 mm -878 mm
Headroom, Row 3 0 mm 836 mm -836 mm
Shoulder Room, Row 3 0 mm 1,440 mm -1 mm
Hip Room, Row 3 0 mm 1,229 mm -1 mm
Legroom, Row 3 0 mm 612 mm -612 mm
Total Legroom 2,060 mm (over 2 rows) 2,553 mm (over 3 rows) 0 mm
Cargo Volume, Minimum 895 L 340 L 555 L
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 31.6 1,036 L 30.6
Cargo Volume, Maximum 1,809 L 2,127 L -1 L

Return to top

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 GMC Terrain

2017 GMC Terrain Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearComment
2018 The first-generation GMC Terrain took advantage of a long, 112.5-inch wheelbase to offer exceptional rear legroom--nearly 40 inches of it. On paper, the 2018 Terrain has only a half-inch less combined legroom despite a wheelbase shrink of 5.2 inches (to better align the vehicle with competitors and open up space for the downsized Acadia). In reality, rear legroom seems ample but no longer outstanding. The rear seats in the Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4 are similarly roomy. But the Terrain does pull ahead when evaluating rear seat comfort. Its high-mounted rear seat cushion provides better leg support than others. The Compass's rear seat is lower and firmer. The Terrain's rear seat can even recline a little. Based on their specs, the Jeep is nearly as roomy inside as the GMC. Headroom, shoulder room, and combined legroom specs all differ by less than an inch. In reality, the Jeep's interior feels significantly narrower. And the Jeep Cherokee? All of its interior specs are also within an inch of the Terrain's, though often in the other direction. Why does Jeep offer two crossovers so close in size? This isn't clear. In terms of specs, they differ most in combined legroom and cargo volume. The Cherokee has 1.3 inches more of the former--good to have, but hardly justification for an additional model--and about ten percent LESS of the latter. How can the larger Jeep have less cargo volume? I suspect that the Compass was measured more creatively, and cannot actually hold as much cargo. Based on their specs--and I always take cargo volume specs with more than a little salt--the new Terrain can swallow a few more cubic feet of cargo than the Compass (63.3 vs. 59.8) but falls well short of the RAV4 (70.6 in hybrid form, 73.4 otherwise). A Honda CR-V can fit a couple more cubes than the RAV4. The GMC Terrain and the Jeeps compensate for not having the most spacious cargo areas with front passenger seats that fold forward. If your cargo is long but not wide, one of these is the way to go. Though closely related to the GMC, the Chevrolet Equinox does not offer this feature. see full GMC Terrain review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 GMC Terrain

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 GMC Terrain.

Be the first!

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Toyota 4Runner

2006 Toyota 4Runner Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2006 4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
Lots of room in the backs seat, and actually decent 3rd row seating for the kids. Kills the cargo area though. see full Toyota 4Runner review
2005 4dr SUV 245-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
Plenty of room for 3 people. see full Toyota 4Runner review
2006 Toyota 4Runner Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2007 4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
This is a vehicle designed for people 5 fett 11 inches and under - no two ways about it. If you are 5 feel 11 or over you will not enjoy this truck. see full Toyota 4Runner review
2007 4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
The consequence of reducing overall height while maintaining trail worthy obstacle clearance is a relatively low to floor seating position more attune to sedans. Seats are comfortable though even for a big framed person. see full Toyota 4Runner review
2007 4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
Seat position low to floor leaves you sitting with a knee high position. Seats itself are comfortable, but there is no space for your feet under the front seats. All floor surfaces are almost flat though considering it truck roots. see full Toyota 4Runner review
2007 4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
Not a power seat. Cannot get it into an optimum adjustment. see full Toyota 4Runner review
2007 4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
No third row, cargo space small see full Toyota 4Runner review
2006 4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
After a trip to TX from CO my back was hurting. see full Toyota 4Runner review
2006 4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
the front seat is too close to the floor. see full Toyota 4Runner review
 
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all GMC models.