| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2019 GMC Terrain and 2006 Toyota Sequoia Specifications
| Model Year | 2019 | 2006 | |
| Model | GMC Terrain | Toyota Sequoia | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,725 mm | 3,000 mm | -1 mm |
| Length | 4,630 mm | 5,179 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,839 mm | 2,004 mm | -1 mm |
| Height | 1,661 mm | 1,869 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,564 kg | 2,309 kg | -1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 56 L | 100 L | -44 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,016 mm | 1,044 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,453 mm | 1,577 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,382 mm | 1,516 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,039 mm | 1,057 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 978 mm | 1,031 mm | 977 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,412 mm | 1,580 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,316 mm | 1,481 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,008 mm | 983 mm | -982 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 935 mm | -935 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,547 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,278 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 757 mm | -757 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,047 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,797 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 838 L | 753 L | 85 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 29.6 | 1,849 L | 28.6 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,792 L | 3,627 L | -2 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2019 GMC Terrain
| 2019 GMC Terrain Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2018 | The first-generation GMC Terrain took advantage of a long, 112.5-inch wheelbase to offer exceptional rear legroom--nearly 40 inches of it. On paper, the 2018 Terrain has only a half-inch less combined legroom despite a wheelbase shrink of 5.2 inches (to better align the vehicle with competitors and open up space for the downsized Acadia). In reality, rear legroom seems ample but no longer outstanding. The rear seats in the Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4 are similarly roomy. But the Terrain does pull ahead when evaluating rear seat comfort. Its high-mounted rear seat cushion provides better leg support than others. The Compass's rear seat is lower and firmer. The Terrain's rear seat can even recline a little. Based on their specs, the Jeep is nearly as roomy inside as the GMC. Headroom, shoulder room, and combined legroom specs all differ by less than an inch. In reality, the Jeep's interior feels significantly narrower. And the Jeep Cherokee? All of its interior specs are also within an inch of the Terrain's, though often in the other direction. Why does Jeep offer two crossovers so close in size? This isn't clear. In terms of specs, they differ most in combined legroom and cargo volume. The Cherokee has 1.3 inches more of the former--good to have, but hardly justification for an additional model--and about ten percent LESS of the latter. How can the larger Jeep have less cargo volume? I suspect that the Compass was measured more creatively, and cannot actually hold as much cargo. Based on their specs--and I always take cargo volume specs with more than a little salt--the new Terrain can swallow a few more cubic feet of cargo than the Compass (63.3 vs. 59.8) but falls well short of the RAV4 (70.6 in hybrid form, 73.4 otherwise). A Honda CR-V can fit a couple more cubes than the RAV4. The GMC Terrain and the Jeeps compensate for not having the most spacious cargo areas with front passenger seats that fold forward. If your cargo is long but not wide, one of these is the way to go. Though closely related to the GMC, the Chevrolet Equinox does not offer this feature. see full GMC Terrain review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2019 GMC Terrain
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2019 GMC Terrain.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Toyota Sequoia
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2006 Toyota Sequoia.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all GMC models.
