| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Honda Accord and 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2016 | |
| Model | Honda Accord | Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban | |
| Engine | 3.5L V6 OHC-4v 271 hp@6200 254 lb-ft@5000 |
5.3L V8 OHV-2v 355 hp@5600 383 lb-ft@4100 |
|
| Transmission | 5-speed automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | |
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 110.2 in | 116.0 in | -5.8 in |
| Length | 194.1 in | 204.0 in | -9.9 in |
| Width | 72.7 in | 80.5 in | -7.8 in |
| Height | 58.1 in | 74.4 in | -16.3 in |
| Curb Weight | 3600 lb. | 5466 lb. | -1866 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 18.5 gal. | 26.0 gal. | -7.5 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 41.4 in | 42.8 in | -1.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 58.2 in | 64.8 in | -6.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 56.6 in | 60.8 in | -4.2 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.5 in | 45.3 in | -2.8 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 38.5 in | 38.7 in | -0.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 56.4 in | 65.1 in | -8.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 54.3 in | 60.3 in | -6 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 37.2 in | 39.0 in | -1.8 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 38.1 in | -38.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 62.6 in | -62.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 49.3 in | -49.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 24.8 in | -24.8 in |
| Total Legroom | 79.7 in (over 2 rows) | 109.1 in (over 3 rows) | -29.4 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 14.0 ft3 | 15.3 ft3 | -1.3 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 14.0 | 51.6 ft3 | -37.6 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 14.0 ft3 | 94.7 ft3 | -80.7 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Honda Accord
| 2010 Honda Accord Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Sedan 177-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
6'4" and plenty of head and leg room. Leather seats and lumbar support fit me well. see full Honda Accord review |
| 2011 | 4dr Sedan 190-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
Another reason I'm glad I got the EX model. The power lumbar on the drivers seat is my backs best friend. Even after 16 hour days and 1100 miles, my back is fine. Excellent seats! see full Honda Accord review |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 177-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
Spacing is good, material use is comfortable. see full Honda Accord review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 190-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
Even with the front driver and passenger seats move all the way to the back of their tracks and reclined somewhat, there is still plenty of legroom for backseat passengers (even 6 footers). This is really a full size sedan and not a mid-size. see full Honda Accord review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 190-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
Front seats offer plenty of range of motion. They are comfortable for extended periods of time. Side bolsters are not too soft, not to rigid. Just right. see full Honda Accord review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 271-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
Placement and tactile feel. see full Honda Accord review |
| 2010 Honda Accord Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 177-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
Lumbar support is too aggressive, and it is non-adjustable in the LX model. I have gotten used to them, but they are nowhere near the same league as my previously owned Saabs and BMWs. see full Honda Accord review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
| 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | Some (perhaps more than some) people are drawn to large SUVs because they like to feel like the king of the road when behind the wheel. Others need a lot of space while driving, or at least feel they do. Few vehicles have more front seat room than the new Tahoe. With an inch-and-a-half less shoulder room, the Ford's front-row dimensions aren't quite as generous, and its taller, shifter-festooned console is more intrusive. The front seats are comfortable in both. The Expedition's are a little wider and softer, and they're upholstered with especially rich hides in the King Ranch and Platinum (vs. the most recently tested and photographed Limited). Whether this is preferable is a matter of taste. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review | |
| 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Both the Tahoe and Expedition have roomy, comfortable second-row seats, with a slight edge to the higher cushions in the Chevrolet. Bonus points to the Tahoe for automatic rear climate controls (they're manual in the Expedition). Move to the third-row seat, and you'll wonder why, despite redesigns for 2007 and 2015, General Motors has stubbornly refused to follow Ford's 2003 switch from a solid rear axle to an independent rear suspension. With a solid axle, the rear floor must be high to permit the rear differential to travel up and down when a wheel hits a bump. Consequently, the Tahoe's third row seat must be very thinly constructed and mounted very close to the floor. Even pre-teen children won't be comfortable in it. In sharp contrast, the Expedition's third-row seat is higher off the floor than its second-row seat, much less the ridiculously low third row in the Tahoe, and is--surprise--considerably more comfortable as a result. The Suburban's third-row seat is roomier than the Tahoe's but still far inferior to the Expedition's. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban.
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
