| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Honda Accord and 2017 Nissan Armada Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2017 | |
| Model | Honda Accord | Nissan Armada | |
| Engine | 3.5L V6 OHC-4v 271 hp@6200 254 lb-ft@5000 |
5.6L V8 DOHC-4v 390 hp@5800 394 lb-ft@4000 |
|
| Transmission | 5-speed automatic | 7-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | |
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,799 mm | 3,076 mm | -1 mm |
| Length | 4,930 mm | 5,306 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,847 mm | 2,029 mm | -1 mm |
| Height | 1,476 mm | 1,925 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,612 kg | 2,529 kg | -1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 70 L | 98 L | -28 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,052 mm | 1,039 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,478 mm | 1,621 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,438 mm | 1,504 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,080 mm | 1,064 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 978 mm | 1,016 mm | 977 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,433 mm | 1,610 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,379 mm | 1,483 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 945 mm | 1,041 mm | 944 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 925 mm | -925 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,537 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,240 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 721 mm | -721 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,024 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,827 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 396 L | 467 L | -71 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 14.0 | 1,413 L | 13 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 14.0 | 2,701 L | 12 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Honda Accord
| 2012 Honda Accord Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2013 | Compared to any midsize sedan, the Accord Coupe's rear seat is tight and difficult to get into and out of. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself, but with only an inch between my scalp and the rear window and about the same between my knees and the front seat back. The rear seat is only in the "whys" here because it's being compared to the rear seats in other coupes, including the Hyundai's, and these are even tighter. Same story with cargo capacity. The Accord Coupe's 13.7 cubic-foot trunk would be marginally competitive in a midsize sedan, but it compares very well to those in other coupes. The Genesis Coupe checks in at 10.0. see full Honda Accord review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Honda Accord
| 2012 Honda Accord Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Sedan 190-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
Another reason I'm glad I got the EX model. The power lumbar on the drivers seat is my backs best friend. Even after 16 hour days and 1100 miles, my back is fine. Excellent seats! see full Honda Accord review |
| 2011 | 4dr Sedan 177-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
6'4" and plenty of head and leg room. Leather seats and lumbar support fit me well. see full Honda Accord review |
| 2012 Honda Accord Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Sedan 278-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed automatic FWD |
Many reviews online state how comforable the seats are in the Accord, I cannot agree with them. I have owned a 2013 Altima as well and it is much more comfortable, but that car has a stability problem on the highway. see full Honda Accord review |
| 2013 | 4dr Sedan 185-horsepower 2.4L I4 CVT FWD |
Front headrests are inclined too far forward, making the seats very uncomfortable for shorter drivers. Drivers taller than 6'3" won't have a problem. But as a shorter driver, the uncomfortable seats have caused extreme upper back pain. see full Honda Accord review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Nissan Armada
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Nissan Armada.
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
