| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Honda CR-V and 2012 Ford Taurus Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2012 | |
| Model | Honda CR-V | Ford Taurus | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 103.1 in | 112.9 in | -9.8 in |
| Length | 179.3 in | 202.9 in | -23.6 in |
| Width | 71.6 in | 76.2 in | -4.6 in |
| Height | 66.1 in | 60.7 in | 5.4 in |
| Curb Weight | 3389 lb. | 4015 lb. | -626 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 15.3 gal. | 20.0 gal. | -4.7 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.9 in | 39.0 in | 1.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.9 in | 57.9 in | -1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.9 in | 56.3 in | -0.4 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.3 in | 41.9 in | -0.6 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 38.6 in | 37.8 in | 0.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 56.0 in | 56.9 in | -0.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 54.6 in | 55.8 in | -1.2 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 38.5 in | 38.1 in | 0.4 in |
| Total Legroom | 79.8 in (over 2 rows) | 80 in (over 2 rows) | -0.2 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 35.7 ft3 | 20.1 ft3 | 15.6 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 72.9 ft3 | 20.1 ft3 | 52.8 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Honda CR-V
| 2010 Honda CR-V Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 180-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic AWD |
I sometimes have elderly passengers. They do not have to squirm to get in or do calesthenics to get out. see full Honda CR-V review |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 166-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
The caravan style arm rests are ugly but extremely comfortable. see full Honda CR-V review |
| 2010 Honda CR-V Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 180-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic AWD |
Could not find a comfortable position, even with a power seat. see full Honda CR-V review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Ford Taurus
| 2012 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Three adult room in the back seat - comfortably! see full Ford Taurus review |
| 2012 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The front seats are horrible- similar to airline seats, and no amount of adjusting or adding cushions helped. I'm 6'2 and my wife is 5'3.and neither of us could get comfortable. After 2 weeks, it was actually painful to drive this car. see full Ford Taurus review |
| 2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Not enough headroom for adults in the rear seat. Seat comfort is as poor as the front seats. see full Ford Taurus review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
