Honda CR-V Honda CR-V 2012 GMC Terrain GMC Terrain 2017

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Honda CR-V (2012) vs. GMC Terrain (2017) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2012 Honda CR-V and 2017 GMC Terrain specs.

2012 Honda CR-V and 2017 GMC Terrain Specifications

Model Year 2012 2017  
Model Honda CR-V GMC Terrain  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body 4dr SUV 4dr SUV  
      Difference
Wheelbase 2,619 mm 2,858 mm 0 mm
Length 4,529 mm 4,712 mm 0 mm
Width 1,819 mm 1,849 mm 0 mm
Height 1,643 mm 1,684 mm 0 mm
Curb Weight 1,499 kg 1,720 kg 0 kg
Fuel Capacity 58 L 71 L -13 L
Headroom, Row 1 1,013 mm 1,011 mm 0 mm
Shoulder Room, Row 1 1,488 mm 1,415 mm 0 mm
Hip Room, Row 1 1,384 mm 1,400 mm 0 mm
Legroom, Row 1 1,049 mm 1,046 mm 0 mm
Headroom, Row 2 980 mm 996 mm -16 mm
Shoulder Room, Row 2 1,433 mm 1,405 mm 0 mm
Hip Room, Row 2 1,349 mm 1,303 mm 0 mm
Legroom, Row 2 973 mm 1,013 mm 972 mm
Total Legroom 2,022 mm (over 2 rows) 2,060 mm (over 2 rows) 0 mm
Cargo Volume, Minimum 1,053 L 895 L -894 L
Cargo Volume, Maximum 2,008 L 1,809 L 1 L

Return to top

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Honda CR-V

2012 Honda CR-V Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearComment
2013 Though a column-mounted shifter and a minivan-like walk through to the second row went away with the third-generation CR-V, Honda's compact crossover retains an interior that puts roominess and functionality ahead of sportiness. Thanks to an open design with a relatively compact instrument panel and center console, both rows feel even roomier than the class-leading (or close to it) specs suggest. Though the second-row seat is mounted too low to provide adults with much thigh support, the floor back there remains hump-free. see full Honda CR-V review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Honda CR-V

2012 Honda CR-V Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2013 4dr SUV 185-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed automatic FWD
Front seats very comfortable and roomy. They almost appear too wide, and I wish they had more lateral support. Very useable center console with a flat top. see full Honda CR-V review
2011 4dr SUV 180-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed automatic AWD
I sometimes have elderly passengers. They do not have to squirm to get in or do calesthenics to get out. see full Honda CR-V review
 

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 GMC Terrain

2017 GMC Terrain Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearComment
2018 The first-generation GMC Terrain took advantage of a long, 112.5-inch wheelbase to offer exceptional rear legroom--nearly 40 inches of it. On paper, the 2018 Terrain has only a half-inch less combined legroom despite a wheelbase shrink of 5.2 inches (to better align the vehicle with competitors and open up space for the downsized Acadia). In reality, rear legroom seems ample but no longer outstanding. The rear seats in the Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4 are similarly roomy. But the Terrain does pull ahead when evaluating rear seat comfort. Its high-mounted rear seat cushion provides better leg support than others. The Compass's rear seat is lower and firmer. The Terrain's rear seat can even recline a little. Based on their specs, the Jeep is nearly as roomy inside as the GMC. Headroom, shoulder room, and combined legroom specs all differ by less than an inch. In reality, the Jeep's interior feels significantly narrower. And the Jeep Cherokee? All of its interior specs are also within an inch of the Terrain's, though often in the other direction. Why does Jeep offer two crossovers so close in size? This isn't clear. In terms of specs, they differ most in combined legroom and cargo volume. The Cherokee has 1.3 inches more of the former--good to have, but hardly justification for an additional model--and about ten percent LESS of the latter. How can the larger Jeep have less cargo volume? I suspect that the Compass was measured more creatively, and cannot actually hold as much cargo. Based on their specs--and I always take cargo volume specs with more than a little salt--the new Terrain can swallow a few more cubic feet of cargo than the Compass (63.3 vs. 59.8) but falls well short of the RAV4 (70.6 in hybrid form, 73.4 otherwise). A Honda CR-V can fit a couple more cubes than the RAV4. The GMC Terrain and the Jeeps compensate for not having the most spacious cargo areas with front passenger seats that fold forward. If your cargo is long but not wide, one of these is the way to go. Though closely related to the GMC, the Chevrolet Equinox does not offer this feature. see full GMC Terrain review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 GMC Terrain

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 GMC Terrain.

Be the first!

See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.