| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Honda CR-V and 2012 Honda Fit Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2012 | |
| Model | Honda CR-V | Honda Fit | |
| Engine | 2.4L I4 DOHC-4v 134 kW@6800 218 Nm@4400 |
1.5L I4 OHC-4v 87 kW@6600 144 Nm@4800 |
|
| Transmission | 5-speed automatic | 5-speed automatic | |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,619 mm | 2,499 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,554 mm | 4,105 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,819 mm | 1,694 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,679 mm | 1,524 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,537 kg | 1,169 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 58 L | 40 L | 18 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,039 mm | 1,026 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,445 mm | 1,339 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,420 mm | 1,308 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,049 mm | 1,049 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 980 mm | 991 mm | -11 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,422 mm | 1,303 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,387 mm | 1,303 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 978 mm | 876 mm | 102 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,027 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,925 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 1,011 L | 583 L | -582 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,064 L | 1,623 L | 1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Honda CR-V
| 2011 Honda CR-V Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 180-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic AWD |
I sometimes have elderly passengers. They do not have to squirm to get in or do calesthenics to get out. see full Honda CR-V review |
| 2011 Honda CR-V Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 180-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic AWD |
Could not find a comfortable position, even with a power seat. see full Honda CR-V review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Honda Fit
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The best in this category (when you take into consideration the size of the trunk). see full Honda Fit review |
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat bottoms are typical Japanese style short bottomed and not conducive to long duration drives. see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
One more thing. Rear seat comfort was obviously not a big selling point, nor a necessary feature. But one piece of it was worse than it had to be: the rear seat headrests. The artful circular shape and limited adjustment made the rear seats even harder to use; the headrest would tend to jab passengers in their spine. A better solution which was more even with the seat back would really have helped here. see full Honda Fit review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
