Model Year | 2010 | 2013 | |
Model | Honda CR-V | Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Engine | 2.4L I4 DOHC-4v 180 hp@6800 161 lb-ft@4400 |
3.0L V6 OHC-4v 230 hp@6250 215 lb-ft@3750 |
|
Transmission | 5-speed automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,619 mm | 2,670 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,554 mm | 4,641 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,819 mm | 1,801 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,679 mm | 1,679 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,588 kg | 1,745 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 58 L | 63 L | -5 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,039 mm | 1,024 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,445 mm | 1,433 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,420 mm | 1,326 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,049 mm | 1,057 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 980 mm | 973 mm | 7 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,422 mm | 1,425 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,387 mm | 1,318 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 978 mm | 935 mm | 43 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 899 mm | -899 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,265 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 993 mm | -993 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 704 mm | -704 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,027 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,695 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 1,011 L | 422 L | -421 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 35.7 | 1,025 L | 34.7 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,064 L | 2,056 L | 0 L |
2010 Honda CR-V Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 4dr SUV 180-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic AWD |
I sometimes have elderly passengers. They do not have to squirm to get in or do calesthenics to get out. see full Honda CR-V review |
2009 | 4dr SUV 166-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
The caravan style arm rests are ugly but extremely comfortable. see full Honda CR-V review |
2010 Honda CR-V Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2010 | 4dr SUV 180-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic AWD |
Could not find a comfortable position, even with a power seat. see full Honda CR-V review |
2013 Mitsubishi Outlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
There's a reason three-row crossovers tend to be much larger than this pair. The third-row seat in the Kia Sorento doesn't provide enough headroom for the average adult male. Both comfort and knee room are also in short supply. You might think that a seat couldn't get any tighter than the Sorento's third row. But, based on the official specs, the Outlander has nearly four inches less combined legroom--a huge difference. Even children won't fit in the Mitsubishi's third row unless you slide the second row forward much of the way. The 2014's third row seat is at least a conventional seat. Last year it was little more than a sling. In either vehicle the second row split bench is roomy and comfortable, with enough height off the floor to provide adults with good thigh support. But the rear passengers in the Outlander don't get air vents. Those in the Kia do. see full Mitsubishi Outlander review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander.