Model Year | 2015 | 2017 | |
Model | Honda CR-Z | Chevrolet SS | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 2dr Hatch | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 95.9 in | 114.8 in | -18.9 in |
Length | 160.5 in | 195.5 in | -35 in |
Width | 68.5 in | 74.7 in | -6.2 in |
Height | 54.9 in | 57.9 in | -3 in |
Curb Weight | 2639 lb. | 3997 lb. | -1358 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 10.6 gal. | 18.8 gal. | -8.2 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 36.9 in | 38.7 in | -1.8 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 53.8 in | 59.1 in | -5.3 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 51.5 in | 57.2 in | -5.7 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 42.7 in | 42.3 in | 0.4 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 38.0 in | -38 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 59.0 in | -59 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 58.0 in | -58 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 39.7 in | -39.7 in |
Total Legroom | 42.7 in (over 1 rows) | 82 in (over 2 rows) | -39.3 in |
Cargo Volume | 25.1 ft3 | 16.4 ft3 | 8.7 ft3 |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Honda CR-Z.
2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is functional and roomy. I'm 6'4" and with the drivers seat in my preferred postion there is still a decent amount of legroom behind. Overall much better than the Charger/Challenger. see full Chevrolet SS review |
2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
The front seat is just OK. Feels like a pretty flat bottom and fairly hard. Also, for a car with sporting pretentions there is surprisingly little side bolstering. see full Chevrolet SS review |