Model Year | 2013 | 2015 | |
Model | Honda CR-Z | Land Rover Range Rover | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 2dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 95.9 in | 115.0 in | -19.1 in |
Length | 160.5 in | 196.8 in | -36.3 in |
Width | 68.5 in | 78.1 in | -9.6 in |
Height | 54.9 in | 72.3 in | -17.4 in |
Curb Weight | 2639 lb. | 5137 lb. | -2498 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 10.6 gal. | 27.7 gal. | -17.1 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 36.9 in | 39.3 in | -2.4 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 53.8 in | 60.7 in | -6.9 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 51.5 in | 0.0 in | 51.5 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 42.7 in | 42.5 in | 0.2 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 39.2 in | -39.2 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 59.4 in | -59.4 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 40.2 in | -40.2 in |
Total Legroom | 42.7 in (over 1 rows) | 82.7 in (over 2 rows) | -40 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 25.1 ft3 | 32.1 ft3 | -7 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 25.1 ft3 | 71.7 ft3 | -46.6 ft3 |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Honda CR-Z.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Land Rover Range Rover.