| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Honda CR-Z and 2012 Mazda CX-9 Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2012 | |
| Model | Honda CR-Z | Mazda CX-9 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,436 mm | 2,875 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,102 mm | 5,085 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,740 mm | 1,935 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,394 mm | 1,727 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,201 kg | 1,964 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 40 L | 76 L | -36 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 937 mm | 1,006 mm | 936 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,367 mm | 1,509 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,308 mm | 1,435 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,085 mm | 1,039 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 0 mm | 991 mm | -991 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,491 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,422 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,011 mm | -1 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 899 mm | -899 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,445 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,110 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 823 mm | -823 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,085 mm (over 1 row) | 2,873 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 711 L | 487 L | 224 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 25.1 | 1,368 L | 24.1 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 25.1 | 2,852 L | 23.1 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Honda CR-Z
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Honda CR-Z.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Mazda CX-9
| 2012 Mazda CX-9 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat hugs in the right places without being cumbersome. Headrest position is much better than the midsize GM vehicles I test-drove (Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, Buick Enclave). see full Mazda CX-9 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
