| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Honda CR-Z and 2003 Mazda Tribute Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2003 | |
| Model | Honda CR-Z | Mazda Tribute | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Honda CR-Z
| 2011 Honda CR-Z Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 2dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.5L I4 Hybrid 7-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
No rear seats in the US version, which greatly reduces passenger utility. However, the storage space is much bigger than many cars in the same price range. Driver and passenger seats are otherwise adequately comfortable. see full Honda CR-Z review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2003 Mazda Tribute
| 2003 Mazda Tribute Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2003 | 4dr SUV 200-horsepower 3.0L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
Enough space for knees even for tall passengers. see full Mazda Tribute review |
| 2003 Mazda Tribute Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2003 | 4dr SUV 200-horsepower 3.0L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
A bit short seat and not enough supportive. see full Mazda Tribute review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
