Model Year | 2011 | 2016 | |
Model | Honda CR-Z | Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 2dr Hatch | 2dr Hardtop conv. | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,436 mm | 2,586 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,079 mm | 4,618 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,740 mm | 1,877 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,394 mm | 1,316 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,196 kg | 1,785 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 40 L | 75 L | -35 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 937 mm | 993 mm | -56 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,367 mm | 1,410 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,308 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,085 mm | 1,090 mm | 0 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,085 mm (over 1 row) | 1,090 mm (over 1 row) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 711 L | 241 L | 470 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 25.1 | 382 L | -356.9 |
2011 Honda CR-Z Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 2dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.5L I4 Hybrid 7-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
No rear seats in the US version, which greatly reduces passenger utility. However, the storage space is much bigger than many cars in the same price range. Driver and passenger seats are otherwise adequately comfortable. see full Honda CR-Z review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Mercedes-Benz SL.