| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Honda CR-Z and 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2015 | |
| Model | Honda CR-Z | Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 95.9 in | 105.1 in | -9.2 in |
| Length | 160.6 in | 183.3 in | -22.7 in |
| Width | 68.5 in | 70.9 in | -2.4 in |
| Height | 54.9 in | 66.1 in | -11.2 in |
| Curb Weight | 2637 lb. | 3274 lb. | -637 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 10.6 gal. | 16.6 gal. | -6 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 36.9 in | 40.6 in | -3.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 53.8 in | 56.4 in | -2.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 51.5 in | 52.6 in | -1.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.7 in | 40.9 in | 1.8 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 38.4 in | -38.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 56.0 in | -56 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 51.7 in | -51.7 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 37.3 in | -37.3 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 35.7 in | -35.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 50.6 in | -50.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 39.4 in | -39.4 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 28.2 in | -28.2 in |
| Total Legroom | 42.7 in (over 1 rows) | 106.4 in (over 3 rows) | -63.7 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 25.1 ft3 | 10.3 ft3 | 14.8 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 25.1 | 34.2 ft3 | -9.1 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 25.1 ft3 | 63.3 ft3 | -38.2 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Honda CR-Z
| 2011 Honda CR-Z Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 2dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.5L I4 Hybrid 7-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
No rear seats in the US version, which greatly reduces passenger utility. However, the storage space is much bigger than many cars in the same price range. Driver and passenger seats are otherwise adequately comfortable. see full Honda CR-Z review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander
| 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| There's a reason three-row crossovers tend to be much larger than this pair. The third-row seat in the Kia Sorento doesn't provide enough headroom for the average adult male. Both comfort and knee room are also in short supply. You might think that a seat couldn't get any tighter than the Sorento's third row. But, based on the official specs, the Outlander has nearly four inches less combined legroom--a huge difference. Even children won't fit in the Mitsubishi's third row unless you slide the second row forward much of the way. The 2014's third row seat is at least a conventional seat. Last year it was little more than a sling. In either vehicle the second row split bench is roomy and comfortable, with enough height off the floor to provide adults with good thigh support. But the rear passengers in the Outlander don't get air vents. Those in the Kia do. see full Mitsubishi Outlander review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander.
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
