| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Honda CR-Z and 2009 Toyota Camry Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2009 | |
| Model | Honda CR-Z | Toyota Camry | |
| Engine | 1.5L I4 Hybrid OHC-4v 122 hp@6000 123 lb-ft@1000 |
2.4L I4 Hybrid DOHC-4v 187 hp@6000 137 lb-ft@4000 |
|
| Transmission | 7-speed shiftable CVT | CVT | |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
| Body | 2dr Hatch | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 95.9 in | 109.3 in | -13.4 in |
| Length | 160.6 in | 189.2 in | -28.6 in |
| Width | 68.5 in | 71.1 in | -2.6 in |
| Height | 54.9 in | 57.9 in | -3 in |
| Curb Weight | 2690 lb. | 3680 lb. | -990 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 10.6 gal. | 18.5 gal. | -7.9 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 36.9 in | 38.8 in | -1.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 53.8 in | 57.8 in | -4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 51.5 in | 54.6 in | -3.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.7 in | 41.7 in | 1 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 37.8 in | -37.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 56.9 in | -56.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 53.9 in | -53.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 38.3 in | -38.3 in |
| Total Legroom | 42.7 in (over 1 rows) | 80 in (over 2 rows) | -37.3 in |
| Cargo Volume | 25.1 ft3 | 15.0 ft3 | 10.1 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Honda CR-Z
| 2012 Honda CR-Z Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 2dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.5L I4 Hybrid 7-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
No rear seats in the US version, which greatly reduces passenger utility. However, the storage space is much bigger than many cars in the same price range. Driver and passenger seats are otherwise adequately comfortable. see full Honda CR-Z review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Toyota Camry
| 2009 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
excellent legroom see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
very comfortable on long and short trips see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
more comfortable than Accord and Nissan see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2009 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 169-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Very noisy at high way speeds. see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
Just could not get comfortable. see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
Front seat comfort is another subjective measurement. Our experience driving our 06 and 08 Accords has been that we feel little discomfort or back pain during long trips. We did have more such problems with our 05 and 06 rentals, although not severe. see full Toyota Camry review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
