| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Honda CR-Z and 2010 Toyota Highlander Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2010 | |
| Model | Honda CR-Z | Toyota Highlander | |
| Engine | 1.5L I4 Hybrid OHC-4v 122 hp@6000 123 lb-ft@1000 |
3.5L V6 Hybrid DOHC-4v 245 hp@6000 234 lb-ft@4800 |
|
| Transmission | 7-speed shiftable CVT | CVT | |
| Drivetrain | FWD | AWD | |
| Body | 2dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,436 mm | 2,789 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,079 mm | 4,785 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,740 mm | 1,910 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,394 mm | 1,730 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,220 kg | 2,045 kg | -1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 40 L | 73 L | -33 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 937 mm | 1,031 mm | 936 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,367 mm | 1,516 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,308 mm | 1,440 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,085 mm | 1,097 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,019 mm | -1 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,511 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,435 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 0 mm | 973 mm | -973 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 922 mm | -922 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,397 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,074 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 742 mm | -742 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,085 mm (over 1 row) | 2,812 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 711 L | 292 L | 419 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 25.1 | 1,198 L | 24.1 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 25.1 | 2,701 L | 23.1 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Honda CR-Z
| 2012 Honda CR-Z Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 2dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.5L I4 Hybrid 7-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
No rear seats in the US version, which greatly reduces passenger utility. However, the storage space is much bigger than many cars in the same price range. Driver and passenger seats are otherwise adequately comfortable. see full Honda CR-Z review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Toyota Highlander
| 2010 Toyota Highlander Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 187-horsepower 2.7L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Lots of room in the second row, including seats that recline and move back & forth. Having the third row as an option for occasional use was really the deciding factor. see full Toyota Highlander review |
| 2010 Toyota Highlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 245-horsepower 3.5L V6 Hybrid CVT AWD |
Third row minimal legroom see full Toyota Highlander review |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Only two seats in the 2nd row, very small leg room in the 3rd row. see full Toyota Highlander review |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
seats were hard and flat. Even top of the line luxury model seats were a big disappointment . . . one of the principal reasons we did not choose this vehicle see full Toyota Highlander review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
