Model Year | 2013 | 2011 | |
Model | Honda CR-Z | Volvo XC60 | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 2dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,436 mm | 2,774 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,077 mm | 4,628 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,740 mm | 1,890 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,394 mm | 1,712 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,197 kg | 1,820 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 40 L | 70 L | -30 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 937 mm | 965 mm | -28 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,367 mm | 1,440 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,308 mm | 1,377 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,085 mm | 1,046 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 0 mm | 968 mm | -968 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,402 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,367 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 0 mm | 925 mm | -925 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,085 mm (over 1 row) | 1,971 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 711 L | 872 L | -161 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 25.1 | 1,909 L | 24.1 |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Honda CR-Z.
2011 Volvo XC60 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 300hp 3.0L I6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
They are firm enough & well shaped to be comfortable over the long trip + also comfortable when you first sit in them see full Volvo XC60 review |