| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Honda Element and 2011 Mazda CX-9 Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2011 | |
| Model | Honda Element | Mazda CX-9 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,576 mm | 2,875 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,315 mm | 5,085 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,819 mm | 1,935 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,788 mm | 1,727 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,594 kg | 1,964 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 60 L | 76 L | -16 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,100 mm | 1,006 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,450 mm | 1,509 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,397 mm | 1,435 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,041 mm | 1,039 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 965 mm | 991 mm | -26 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,326 mm | 1,491 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,209 mm | 1,422 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 993 mm | 1,011 mm | 992 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 899 mm | -899 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,445 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,110 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 823 mm | -823 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,035 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,873 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 711 L | 487 L | 224 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 25.1 | 1,368 L | 24.1 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,112 L | 2,852 L | 0 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Honda Element
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2010 Honda Element.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Mazda CX-9
| 2011 Mazda CX-9 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat hugs in the right places without being cumbersome. Headrest position is much better than the midsize GM vehicles I test-drove (Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, Buick Enclave). see full Mazda CX-9 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
