Model Year | 2012 | 2017 | |
Model | Honda Fit | Cadillac ATS | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,499 mm | 2,776 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,105 mm | 4,643 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,694 mm | 1,806 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,524 mm | 1,420 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,132 kg | 1,530 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 40 L | 61 L | -21 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,026 mm | 980 mm | -979 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,339 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,308 mm | 1,346 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,049 mm | 1,080 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 935 mm | 56 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,303 mm | 1,369 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,303 mm | 1,328 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 876 mm | 851 mm | 25 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,925 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,930 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 583 L | 289 L | 294 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,623 L | 10.2 | -9.2 L |
2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The best in this category (when you take into consideration the size of the trunk). see full Honda Fit review |
2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat bottoms are typical Japanese style short bottomed and not conducive to long duration drives. see full Honda Fit review |
2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
One more thing. Rear seat comfort was obviously not a big selling point, nor a necessary feature. But one piece of it was worse than it had to be: the rear seat headrests. The artful circular shape and limited adjustment made the rear seats even harder to use; the headrest would tend to jab passengers in their spine. A better solution which was more even with the seat back would really have helped here. see full Honda Fit review |
2017 Cadillac ATS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Unfortunately, the "why nots" from three years ago remain. The compact Cadillac sedan's rear seat hasn't gotten any larger, and the coupe's is even tighter. Meanwhile, Audi, Lexus, and Mercedes have introduced competitors with roomier rear seats. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a little room to spare in the ATS sedan, and virtually none to spare in the ATS coupe. Drivers who need the seat further back than I do will eliminate leg room for all but the shortest rear passengers. see full Cadillac ATS review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Cadillac ATS.