| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 Honda Fit and 2015 Ford Explorer Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2015 | |
| Model | Honda Fit | Ford Explorer | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,499 mm | 2,860 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,105 mm | 5,006 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,694 mm | 2,004 mm | -1 mm |
| Height | 1,524 mm | 1,788 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,132 kg | 2,057 kg | -1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 40 L | 70 L | -30 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,026 mm | 1,031 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,339 mm | 1,557 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,308 mm | 1,455 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,049 mm | 1,031 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 1,029 mm | 990 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,303 mm | 1,549 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,303 mm | 1,440 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 876 mm | 1,011 mm | 875 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 960 mm | -960 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,290 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,034 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 843 mm | -843 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,925 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,885 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 583 L | 595 L | -12 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 20.6 | 1,240 L | 19.6 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,623 L | 2,285 L | -1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Honda Fit
| 2013 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The best in this category (when you take into consideration the size of the trunk). see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat bottoms are typical Japanese style short bottomed and not conducive to long duration drives. see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
One more thing. Rear seat comfort was obviously not a big selling point, nor a necessary feature. But one piece of it was worse than it had to be: the rear seat headrests. The artful circular shape and limited adjustment made the rear seats even harder to use; the headrest would tend to jab passengers in their spine. A better solution which was more even with the seat back would really have helped here. see full Honda Fit review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Explorer
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Ford Explorer.
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
