| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Honda Fit and 2013 Ford Taurus Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2013 | |
| Model | Honda Fit | Ford Taurus | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,530 mm | 2,868 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,064 mm | 5,154 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,702 mm | 1,935 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,524 mm | 1,542 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,140 kg | 1,800 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 40 L | 76 L | -36 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,003 mm | 991 mm | -990 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,392 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,308 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,052 mm | 1,064 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 953 mm | 960 mm | -7 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,336 mm | 1,445 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,146 mm | 1,417 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 998 mm | 968 mm | 30 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,050 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,032 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 470 L | 569 L | -99 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,492 L | 20.1 | -19.1 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Honda Fit
| 2016 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The new Honda Fit's first row has a a few more inches of elbow room than those in the Versa Note and Fiesta. Consequently, it feels like a larger car--unless you also need leg room. Then it's no better than the Nissan. Drivers with long legs will wish the front seat could slide back farther--but this would cramp the magic style of the rear seat. Even drivers of middling height (e.g. me) might find the driver seat uncomfortable. The headrest and non-adjustable lumbar bulge both jut well forward. Depending on your personal size and shape, this might or might not be an issue. Pay close attention before you buy. see full Honda Fit review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Honda Fit
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Honda Fit.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford Taurus
| 2013 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The front seats are horrible- similar to airline seats, and no amount of adjusting or adding cushions helped. I'm 6'2 and my wife is 5'3.and neither of us could get comfortable. After 2 weeks, it was actually painful to drive this car. see full Ford Taurus review |
| 2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Not enough headroom for adults in the rear seat. Seat comfort is as poor as the front seats. see full Ford Taurus review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
