| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Honda Fit and 2015 Kia Cadenza Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2015 | |
| Model | Honda Fit | Kia Cadenza | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 98.4 in | 112.0 in | -13.6 in |
| Length | 161.6 in | 195.5 in | -33.9 in |
| Width | 66.7 in | 72.8 in | -6.1 in |
| Height | 60.0 in | 58.1 in | 1.9 in |
| Curb Weight | 2496 lb. | 3668 lb. | -1172 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 10.6 gal. | 18.5 gal. | -7.9 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.4 in | 40.0 in | 0.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 52.7 in | 58.3 in | -5.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 51.5 in | 55.5 in | -4 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.3 in | 45.5 in | -4.2 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.0 in | 37.8 in | 1.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 51.3 in | 56.5 in | -5.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 51.3 in | 54.7 in | -3.4 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 34.5 in | 36.8 in | -2.3 in |
| Total Legroom | 75.8 in (over 2 rows) | 82.3 in (over 2 rows) | -6.5 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 20.6 ft3 | 15.9 ft3 | 4.7 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 57.3 ft3 | 15.9 ft3 | 41.4 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Honda Fit
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The best in this category (when you take into consideration the size of the trunk). see full Honda Fit review |
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat bottoms are typical Japanese style short bottomed and not conducive to long duration drives. see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
One more thing. Rear seat comfort was obviously not a big selling point, nor a necessary feature. But one piece of it was worse than it had to be: the rear seat headrests. The artful circular shape and limited adjustment made the rear seats even harder to use; the headrest would tend to jab passengers in their spine. A better solution which was more even with the seat back would really have helped here. see full Honda Fit review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Kia Cadenza
| 2015 Kia Cadenza Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2014 | The Impala has an inch or two more rear legroom than the Cadenza, but this difference is much like that between a pool that is 12 feet deep and one that is 15. All of these sedans have more rear legroom than all but the tallest passengers will need. The Cadenza more than makes up for this trivial difference in quantity with a rear seat cushion that is more comfortably shaped and positioned than that in the Impala, and cushier than the overly firm park bench in the Avalon. The Azera's rear seat is similar, though. If you are carrying tall passengers in back, headroom will be a factor long before legroom will. None of these cars have an abundance of it. When both the Cadenza and the Impala are fitted with panoramic sunroofs the Impala has about a half-inch more. Not a large amount, but for some people it will be the difference between contacting the headliner and not contacting it. see full Kia Cadenza review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Kia Cadenza
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Kia Cadenza.
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
