| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 Honda Fit and 2012 Land Rover LR4 Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2012 | |
| Model | Honda Fit | Land Rover LR4 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 98.4 in | 113.6 in | -15.2 in |
| Length | 161.6 in | 190.1 in | -28.5 in |
| Width | 66.7 in | 75.4 in | -8.7 in |
| Height | 60.0 in | 74.1 in | -14.1 in |
| Curb Weight | 2496 lb. | 5659 lb. | -3163 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 10.6 gal. | 22.8 gal. | -12.2 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.4 in | 40.4 in | 0 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 52.7 in | 59.0 in | -6.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 51.5 in | 0.0 in | 51.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.3 in | 42.4 in | -1.1 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.0 in | 42.4 in | -3.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 51.3 in | 59.2 in | -7.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 51.3 in | 0.0 in | 51.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 34.5 in | 37.6 in | -3.1 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 40.1 in | -40.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 42.8 in | -42.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 36.3 in | -36.3 in |
| Total Legroom | 75.8 in (over 2 rows) | 116.3 in (over 3 rows) | -40.5 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 20.6 ft3 | 9.9 ft3 | 10.7 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 20.6 | 44.5 ft3 | -23.9 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 57.3 ft3 | 87.4 ft3 | -30.1 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Honda Fit
| 2013 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The best in this category (when you take into consideration the size of the trunk). see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat bottoms are typical Japanese style short bottomed and not conducive to long duration drives. see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
One more thing. Rear seat comfort was obviously not a big selling point, nor a necessary feature. But one piece of it was worse than it had to be: the rear seat headrests. The artful circular shape and limited adjustment made the rear seats even harder to use; the headrest would tend to jab passengers in their spine. A better solution which was more even with the seat back would really have helped here. see full Honda Fit review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Land Rover LR4
| 2012 Land Rover LR4 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV 375-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
Perfect family car. fold down seats that, because of the raised headline, are usable by adults. large cargo area, 3rd row a/c.... see full Land Rover LR4 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
