| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Honda Fit and 2006 Nissan Pathfinder Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2006 | |
| Model | Honda Fit | Nissan Pathfinder | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,499 mm | 2,850 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,105 mm | 4,765 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,694 mm | 1,849 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,524 mm | 1,839 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,132 kg | 1,984 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 40 L | 80 L | -40 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,026 mm | 1,016 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,339 mm | 1,481 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,308 mm | 1,410 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,049 mm | 1,077 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 1,013 mm | 990 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,303 mm | 1,483 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,303 mm | 1,463 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 876 mm | 869 mm | 7 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 932 mm | -932 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,450 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,118 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 714 mm | -714 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,925 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,659 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 583 L | 467 L | 116 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 20.6 | 1,393 L | 19.6 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,623 L | 2,243 L | -1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Honda Fit
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The best in this category (when you take into consideration the size of the trunk). see full Honda Fit review |
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat bottoms are typical Japanese style short bottomed and not conducive to long duration drives. see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
One more thing. Rear seat comfort was obviously not a big selling point, nor a necessary feature. But one piece of it was worse than it had to be: the rear seat headrests. The artful circular shape and limited adjustment made the rear seats even harder to use; the headrest would tend to jab passengers in their spine. A better solution which was more even with the seat back would really have helped here. see full Honda Fit review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Nissan Pathfinder
| 2006 Nissan Pathfinder Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Rear seat is cramped. I would gladly give up the third row seat, for more room for the rear (2nd row) seats. see full Nissan Pathfinder review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
Rear seating is small for long hauls, and seats WAY too hard see full Nissan Pathfinder review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
