| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Honda Fit and 2010 Nissan Pathfinder Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2010 | |
| Model | Honda Fit | Nissan Pathfinder | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,499 mm | 2,850 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,105 mm | 4,884 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,694 mm | 1,849 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,524 mm | 1,829 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,132 kg | 2,017 kg | -1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 40 L | 80 L | -40 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,026 mm | 1,016 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,339 mm | 1,481 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,308 mm | 1,410 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,049 mm | 1,077 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 1,016 mm | 990 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,303 mm | 1,483 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,303 mm | 1,463 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 876 mm | 869 mm | 7 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 932 mm | -932 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,450 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,118 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 714 mm | -714 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,925 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,659 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 583 L | 467 L | 116 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 20.6 | 1,393 L | 19.6 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,623 L | 2,243 L | -1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Honda Fit
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The best in this category (when you take into consideration the size of the trunk). see full Honda Fit review |
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat bottoms are typical Japanese style short bottomed and not conducive to long duration drives. see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
One more thing. Rear seat comfort was obviously not a big selling point, nor a necessary feature. But one piece of it was worse than it had to be: the rear seat headrests. The artful circular shape and limited adjustment made the rear seats even harder to use; the headrest would tend to jab passengers in their spine. A better solution which was more even with the seat back would really have helped here. see full Honda Fit review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Nissan Pathfinder
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2010 Nissan Pathfinder.
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
