| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 Honda Fit and 2007 Toyota Highlander Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2007 | |
| Model | Honda Fit | Toyota Highlander | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,499 mm | 2,715 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,105 mm | 4,689 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,694 mm | 1,826 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,524 mm | 1,725 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,132 kg | 1,595 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 40 L | 72 L | -32 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,026 mm | 1,016 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,339 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,308 mm | 1,400 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,049 mm | 1,034 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 1,011 mm | 990 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,303 mm | 1,448 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,303 mm | 1,394 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 876 mm | 925 mm | -49 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 820 mm | -820 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,351 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,011 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 767 mm | -767 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,925 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,725 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 583 L | 297 L | 286 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 20.6 | 1,124 L | 19.6 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,623 L | 2,282 L | -1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Honda Fit
| 2013 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The best in this category (when you take into consideration the size of the trunk). see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat bottoms are typical Japanese style short bottomed and not conducive to long duration drives. see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
One more thing. Rear seat comfort was obviously not a big selling point, nor a necessary feature. But one piece of it was worse than it had to be: the rear seat headrests. The artful circular shape and limited adjustment made the rear seats even harder to use; the headrest would tend to jab passengers in their spine. A better solution which was more even with the seat back would really have helped here. see full Honda Fit review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2007 Toyota Highlander
| 2007 Toyota Highlander Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Third row seating and 2nd row has more leg room than the Murano by about 1". see full Toyota Highlander review |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
4 cup holders see full Toyota Highlander review |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Limo-like leg room and captains chairs see full Toyota Highlander review |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 209-horsepower 3.3L V6 Hybrid CVT AWD |
The widest seats of all Midsize SUVs (X5, Q7, Tourag, Cayenne, etc.) see full Toyota Highlander review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 215-horsepower 3.3L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
Ease of entry and exit and the spacious leg room. see full Toyota Highlander review |
| 2007 Toyota Highlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
3rd row seat is full bench seat and individual side can not be raised or lowered independently. Access and available room much less than MDX. see full Toyota Highlander review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
