Model Year | 2013 | 2006 | |
Model | Honda Fit | Toyota Land Cruiser | |
Engine | 1.5L I4 OHC-4v 117 hp@6600 106 lb-ft@4800 |
4.7L V8 DOHC-4v 275 hp@5400 323 lb-ft@3400 |
|
Transmission | 5-speed manual | 5-speed automatic | |
Drivetrain | FWD | AWD w/low range | |
Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 98.4 in | 112.2 in | -13.8 in |
Length | 161.6 in | 192.5 in | -30.9 in |
Width | 66.7 in | 76.4 in | -9.7 in |
Height | 60.0 in | 73.2 in | -13.2 in |
Curb Weight | 2496 lb. | 5390 lb. | -2894 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 10.6 gal. | 25.4 gal. | -14.8 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 40.4 in | 39.2 in | 1.2 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 52.7 in | 62.4 in | -9.7 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 51.5 in | 58.6 in | -7.1 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 41.3 in | 42.3 in | -1 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 39.0 in | 39.1 in | -0.1 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 51.3 in | 61.2 in | -9.9 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 51.3 in | 57.9 in | -6.6 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 34.5 in | 34.3 in | 0.2 in |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 36.4 in | -36.4 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 61.2 in | -61.2 in |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 56.3 in | -56.3 in |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 27.3 in | -27.3 in |
Total Legroom | 75.8 in (over 2 rows) | 103.9 in (over 3 rows) | -28.1 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 20.6 ft3 | 20.8 ft3 | -0.2 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 20.6 | 39.2 ft3 | -18.6 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 57.3 ft3 | 90.8 ft3 | -33.5 ft3 |
2013 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The best in this category (when you take into consideration the size of the trunk). see full Honda Fit review |
2013 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat bottoms are typical Japanese style short bottomed and not conducive to long duration drives. see full Honda Fit review |
2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
One more thing. Rear seat comfort was obviously not a big selling point, nor a necessary feature. But one piece of it was worse than it had to be: the rear seat headrests. The artful circular shape and limited adjustment made the rear seats even harder to use; the headrest would tend to jab passengers in their spine. A better solution which was more even with the seat back would really have helped here. see full Honda Fit review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2006 Toyota Land Cruiser.