| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2017 Honda HR-V and 2017 Mazda CX-3 Specifications
| Model Year | 2017 | 2017 | |
| Model | Honda HR-V | Mazda CX-3 | |
| Engine | 1.8L I4 OHC-4v 105 kW@6500 172 Nm@4300 |
2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 109 kW@6000 198 Nm@2800 |
|
| Transmission | CVT | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,611 mm | 2,570 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,295 mm | 4,275 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,773 mm | 1,768 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,605 mm | 1,542 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,389 kg | 1,339 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 50 L | 48 L | 2 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,003 mm | 975 mm | -974 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,443 mm | 1,359 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,349 mm | 1,328 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,046 mm | 1,059 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 973 mm | 945 mm | 28 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,384 mm | 1,280 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,204 mm | 1,245 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 998 mm | 889 mm | 109 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,045 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,948 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 688 L | 351 L | 337 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,665 L | 1,260 L | 0 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Honda HR-V
| 2017 Honda HR-V Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2016 | Also like the Fit, the Honda HR-V leads its class in rear seat spaciousness. with a large-sedan-like 39.3 inches of legroom to the Chevrolet Trax's still adult-worthy 35.7. Rear headroom is ample in both pint-sized crossovers. Given the ability to carry four adults with room to spare, it's no surprise that many people are deciding that they don't need a larger vehicle. see full Honda HR-V review | |
| 2017 Honda HR-V Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| I hear more complaints about uncomfortable seats from Honda owners than from those of any other brand. The seats in compact Hondas also happen to be among my least favorite. Those in the HR-V, like the similar seats in the Fit, have a headrest and fixed lumbar bulge that jut too far forward for my personal build. The Trax seats also have a somewhat intrusive headrest, but a power-adjustable lumbar bulge. Try either out extensively before you buy to avoid an unpleasant surprise after the fact. see full Honda HR-V review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Honda HR-V
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Honda HR-V.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Mazda CX-3
| 2017 Mazda CX-3 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2016 | The CX-3's driving position is very good, more car-like even than the HR-V's. The view forward is open. The view rearward, not so much, as the racy styling yields rear windows that are quite a bit smaller than the front ones. To help compensate, the outside mirrors are large plus blind sport warning is standard on the Touring and Grand Touring. The CX-3's driver seat is very comfortable and provides good lateral support in turns. The cloth center pocket is cushy without being mushy. Unlike in the HR-V and some others, the headrest does not jut uncomfortably far forward. But the lumbar bulge is not adjustable. As is, it fit my back well, but many people will wish for more of a bulge. The HR-V's also non-adjustable lumbar bulge was too pronounced for my taste. The JUKE's seats are comfortable, but for effective side bolsters (and then some) you must step up to the NISMO. Worth noting for those of you who get your coffee to go: the cup holders are located beneath the armrest (optional on the Sport, standard on the others). If you want to use them, then you can't use the armrest. see full Mazda CX-3 review | |
| 2017 Mazda CX-3 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| For people who have no interest in a manual transmission (the great majority), the Mazda CX-3's largest shortcoming is a rear seat that is tight even by small car standards. Sitting behind my 5-9 self, my knees pressed lightly against the front seat backs. I wasn't uncomfortable, but felt a little closed-in. A shame, as rear headroom is relatively plentiful and the rear seat is otherwise very comfortable. The HR-V provides about four inches more rear legroom, a big difference. According to their specs, the JUKE has three inches less rear legroom than the Mazda. In reality, though, I had perhaps an inch more rear knee room, but less rear headroom. The Nissan's rear seat might be slightly more adult-friendly than the Mazda's, but neither is a good choice if people taller than me will be sitting in both rows. see full Mazda CX-3 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Mazda CX-3
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Mazda CX-3.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
