(2010) vs. Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo (2006) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2010 and 2006 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo specs.
2010 and 2006 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo Specifications
Model Year |
2010 |
2006 |
|
Model |
|
Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Total Legroom |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010
2009 |
0 |
I'm tall (6'1" or 183cm) - and I have an abnormally long back. The Honda Jazz (or Honda Fit) (2002-2014) is one of the few cars I can comfortably sit in the back seat. In most small cars - and some large cars - I touch the roof. Plus, the origamiversatility of the seating, conversion into storage is brilliant - and better than many far larger cars.
see full review |
2010 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2009 |
0 |
Only 'just' adequate for me at 6'1"/183cm. Taller or longer-limbed drivers would have problems, probably. Headroom is excellent.
see full review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo
2006 |
4dr Sedan 211-horsepower 3.5L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Interior room is outstanding. Trunk room is phenomenal, especially with flip and fold flat rear seat.
see full Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo review |
2005 |
4dr Sedan 180-horsepower 3.4L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Rear seat had good room. Passengers had good leg room. Only adults over 6ft would touch the backs of the front seat with their legs. Draw back was the low roof.
see full Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all
Honda models.