(2008) vs. Mazda CX-9 (2012) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2008 and 2012 Mazda CX-9 specs.
2008 and 2012 Mazda CX-9 Specifications
| Model Year |
2008 |
2012 |
|
| Model |
|
Mazda CX-9 |
|
| Engine |
|
|
|
| Transmission |
|
|
|
| Drivetrain |
|
|
|
| Body |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Difference |
| Total Legroom |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2008
| 2009 |
0 |
I'm tall (6'1" or 183cm) - and I have an abnormally long back. The Honda Jazz (or Honda Fit) (2002-2014) is one of the few cars I can comfortably sit in the back seat. In most small cars - and some large cars - I touch the roof. Plus, the origamiversatility of the seating, conversion into storage is brilliant - and better than many far larger cars.
see full review |
| 2008 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 |
0 |
Only 'just' adequate for me at 6'1"/183cm. Taller or longer-limbed drivers would have problems, probably. Headroom is excellent.
see full review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Mazda CX-9
| 2011 |
4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat hugs in the right places without being cumbersome. Headrest position is much better than the midsize GM vehicles I test-drove (Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, Buick Enclave).
see full Mazda CX-9 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
HatchbacksSee TrueDelta's information for all
Honda models.
