(2010) vs. Toyota Matrix (2008) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2010 and 2008 Toyota Matrix specs.
2010 and 2008 Toyota Matrix Specifications
Model Year |
2010 |
2008 |
|
Model |
|
Toyota Matrix |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Total Legroom |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010
2009 |
0 |
I'm tall (6'1" or 183cm) - and I have an abnormally long back. The Honda Jazz (or Honda Fit) (2002-2014) is one of the few cars I can comfortably sit in the back seat. In most small cars - and some large cars - I touch the roof. Plus, the origamiversatility of the seating, conversion into storage is brilliant - and better than many far larger cars.
see full review |
2010 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2009 |
0 |
Only 'just' adequate for me at 6'1"/183cm. Taller or longer-limbed drivers would have problems, probably. Headroom is excellent.
see full review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2008 Toyota Matrix
2008 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2007 |
4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
very uncomfortable and not ergonomic at all. especially with child sits.
see full Toyota Matrix review |
2007 |
4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
Were flat and didnt grip you well
see full Toyota Matrix review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all
Honda models.